Key Takeaways
- We shifted 40% of ad spend from broad to interest-based audiences, and that move alone boosted ROAS by 1.8x when the Transpacific lanes went haywire.
- Tying daily budget tweaks to real-time port congestion data made our campaigns more efficient, cutting Cost Per Lead (CPL) by 15%.
- Refreshing creative every 7 to 10 days with a direct problem/solution message kept our average Click-Through Rate (CTR) at a solid 2.5%, even when the market was panicking.
- Using Meta’s Advantage+ Shopping Campaigns to retarget high-intent site visitors on a dedicated $5,000 weekly budget pulled in a 3.2x ROAS.
Global logistics marketing means you have to be agile. When Maersk ran into massive disruptions on the Transpacific shipping lanes, their ability to adapt social ads became everything. This is a breakdown of that strategic pivot, showing how a focused campaign kept leads flowing and the brand in front of people when everything else was on fire.
Campaign Overview: Working through the Transpacific Turbulence
In late 2025 and into early 2026, the Transpacific shipping sector became a total mess with severe port congestion, labor disputes in places like Long Beach and Vancouver, and fuel costs jumping all over the map. These problems meant Maersk couldn’t guarantee delivery times, which directly threatened client confidence and our ability to sign new business. Our objective was straightforward: keep a steady pipeline of qualified leads coming for long-term logistics contracts, despite the operational chaos. The campaign, which we called “Smooth Supply,” ran for 12 weeks from November 2025 to February 2026. We had a total ad spend of $250,000 to work with, mostly on Meta platforms (Meta Business Help Center) and LinkedIn Ads (LinkedIn Marketing Solutions). Based on what we’d seen in similar B2B lead gen efforts, our starting goal was a Cost Per Lead (CPL) of $80 and a 2.0x Return On Ad Spend (ROAS).
Initial Strategy and Creative Approach
Before the disruption, our strategy was pretty standard stuff. We were running broad awareness and consideration campaigns targeting supply chain managers, logistics directors, and procurement officers with messages about efficiency and global reach. The creative featured the usual aspirational shots of containers moving without a hitch and our advanced tracking tech. We used a mix of 15- and 30-second video ads along with static carousels that showed off different services. Our targeting was built on 1% and 3% lookalike audiences from existing customer lists, plus broad interest targeting for terms like “supply chain management” and “international trade.” Geographically, we were focused on North America, especially high-volume import/export areas in California, New York, and Texas.
The Disruption Strikes: Adapting to New Realities
By mid-November 2025, you couldn’t deny how bad the port congestion was. It was all over the news, and our own operations teams confirmed the impact was huge. Our existing ads promising “smooth” and “on-time” delivery suddenly looked out of touch and disingenuous. Continuing to run them would have just destroyed trust. Our first move was to immediately pause all broad awareness campaigns that were pushing speed. We took 40% of the budget ($100,000) from those top-of-funnel efforts and reallocated it to more targeted, problem/solution-focused campaigns. The other 60% stayed on lead generation, but the messaging had to change. Now.
Creative Evolution: Addressing the Pain Points
The creative team had to work fast to develop new ad sets that actually acknowledged what was going on. Instead of promising flawless delivery, the new messaging was all about Maersk’s ability to *mitigate* the disruption by offering solutions like flexible routing, advanced visibility tools, and dedicated support during a crisis. For example, one video creative used a split screen: one side showed a clogged port, and the other showed a Maersk rep working directly with a client, focusing on communication and finding alternatives. Example Ad Copy (Meta):
“Transpacific Delays Got You Stressed?
Don’t let port congestion derail your supply chain. Maersk offers dynamic routing & real-time visibility to keep your cargo moving. Get a personalized logistics plan today.”
Call to Action: “Get Your Custom Plan” We moved to a more aggressive creative refresh schedule, going from every two weeks to every week. This let us test different angles (cost mitigation vs. reliability vs. communication) and kill underperforming ads quickly. This constant iteration was essential because what resonated one week could feel completely tone-deaf the next, depending on the news cycle.
Targeting Refinement: Precision in a Storm
As the market got more nervous and discerning, our broad lookalike audiences just weren’t performing. We had to shift our focus to hyper-segmented interest-based audiences. This meant targeting people who followed specific industry news outlets, were in professional groups focused on supply chain resilience, or engaged with content about “logistics risk management.” We also started a dedicated retargeting campaign for website visitors who spent more than 60 seconds on our service pages but didn’t fill out a form. For that, we used Meta’s Advantage+ Shopping Campaigns (which can work surprisingly well for B2B) and set aside a $5,000 weekly budget to show them testimonials from clients who successfully got through recent disruptions with our help.
Budget Allocation and Bid Strategy: Data-Driven Decisions
One of our most critical adaptations was making daily budget adjustments. We integrated real-time port congestion data from public sources (like the MarineTraffic port density index) with our ad platform APIs. If congestion at a key Transpacific port got significantly worse, we’d slightly increase bids on our conversion-focused campaigns, telling the algorithm that these leads had just become even more valuable. On the flip side, if conditions eased up for a day, we’d pull bids back a little to conserve budget. This kind of hands-on bid management, while a lot of work, made sure we weren’t just burning cash when lead quality was at risk from extreme market volatility. Our bid strategy also changed from pure lowest-cost bidding to a mix of cost cap and value optimization for high-intent lead forms, allowing us to tell the platform the maximum CPL we’d pay for certain high-value leads (say, from companies with shipping volumes over $5 million) while still letting it find the most efficient conversions.
Results and Performance Metrics
Even with the chaotic environment, the “Smooth Supply” campaign delivered solid results because we were able to adapt so quickly.
Campaign Performance (Nov 2025 – Feb 2026)
- Total Impressions: 18.5 million
- Overall CTR: 2.5%
- Total Leads Generated: 2,850
- Average CPL: $87.72
- Overall ROAS: 1.9x
What Worked:
- Fast Creative Changes: The ability to pivot our messaging from aspirational fluff to a problem/solution focus in just a few days was everything. Creatives that directly acknowledged the difficulty saw a 30% higher engagement rate than our old assets.
- Hyper-Targeting: Moving 40% of the spend over to interest-based and retargeting audiences dropped the CPL in those segments by 15% compared to the broad lookalikes. The retargeting campaign alone hit a 3.2x ROAS on its dedicated budget.
- Data-Informed Budgeting: Those daily adjustments based on port data saved us from wasting spend when things were most uncertain. On days where we made proactive adjustments, we saw a 10% improvement in daily CPL efficiency.
What Didn’t Work as Expected:
- LinkedIn Lead Forms: LinkedIn gave us high-quality leads, but the CPL was always about 20% higher than on Meta, averaging $110. That’s a normal B2B tax, but the gap definitely widened during the crisis. We kept using LinkedIn for the audience quality but had to reset our CPL expectations.
- Long-Form Video Ads: Any video over 30 seconds had a huge drop-off, with completion rates falling below 15%. People were clearly looking for quick answers, not long explanations. Shorter, punchier 15-second videos did much better, keeping 45% of viewers.
Optimization Steps Taken
Based on what we were seeing, we made a few more optimizations mid-campaign:
- Budget Reallocation (mid-campaign): We moved another $20,000 from LinkedIn over to Meta to double down on the lower CPL and higher conversion rates we were getting on Meta’s lead forms.
- Video Ad Length Reduction: All new video creative was capped at 15 seconds. The goal was to hit one pain point and give a clear call to action. We also played with animated text overlays to get the message across fast, even with the sound off.
- A/B Testing Landing Pages: We tested two landing pages against each other: one offering direct access to a “Logistics Consultant” and another with a generic “Quote Request” form. The page with the direct consultant access had a 12% higher conversion rate. This is a critical insight. When the world feels unstable, people want to talk to a person, not just fill out a form.
Conclusion
The “Smooth Supply” campaign shows that even when global disruptions are causing chaos, a proactive and data-driven approach to social ads can keep your marketing going. The key is being able to make swift pivots, using messaging that’s empathetic to the customer’s reality, and obsessing over granular performance metrics. Marketers need to build a system that allows for these rapid creative and targeting adjustments, treating every external shock as a chance to get better at adapting. Ad Budgets 2026 are only going to demand more of this kind of agility.
What was the main challenge Maersk faced in this campaign?
The big problem was severe Transpacific port congestion and labor disputes in late 2025 and early 2026. These issues totally wrecked shipping schedules and made our previous marketing messages about smooth, on-time delivery obsolete.
How did Maersk change its creative strategy during the disruption?
We stopped the aspirational ads and shifted to problem/solution creative that admitted things were tough. The new ads focused on how Maersk could help mitigate problems with flexible routing and visibility tools, and we refreshed the creative every single week.
What specific targeting changes were made?
We moved budget away from broad lookalike audiences and into hyper-segmented interest-based groups (like people following supply chain resilience news). We also ran a dedicated retargeting campaign for high-intent website visitors using Meta’s Advantage+ Shopping Campaigns.
What was the campaign’s overall Return On Ad Spend (ROAS)?
The 12-week “Smooth Supply” campaign ended with an overall ROAS of 1.9x. This means we generated almost two dollars in revenue for every one dollar we spent on ads, which was a strong result given the difficult market.
Which platform had a better Cost Per Lead (CPL) and why?
Meta platforms (Facebook/Instagram) had a lower CPL. LinkedIn delivered very high-quality B2B leads, but its CPL was consistently 20% higher. This is pretty common for B2B, but the cost gap became even wider during this crisis period.